4

RESULTS

The results of our research show a significant effect of treatment provided in Center Naprej on different life areas of the participants (Wheel of Life) (p < 0,01), which means that there were statistically significant differences in the results on the Wheel of life instrument between first and second assessment. Based on the results, we conclude that inclusion in long-term rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury has a positive effect on various areas of life. There is also an interaction between the duration of the treatment and the quality of life after the injury assessed with the QOLIBRI questionnaire, and also between the duration of the treatment and different areas of life assessed with the instrument Wheel of life (p < 0,01). There is also a trend towards significance of the effect of treatment with the duration of the treatment (p = 0,06, η2 = 0,11 – medium effect).

Table 1: Within-Subjects Contrasts

Wheel

Goals

Type III Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

p

η2

Wheel

Linear

3070,488

1

3070,488

27,294

<,001

,460

Wheel * Gender

Linear

219,878

1

219,878

1,955

,172

,058

Wheel * Time since injury

Linear

89,708

1

89,708

,797

,379

,024

Wheel * Duration of treatment

Linear

431,980

1

431,980

3,840

,059

,107

Wheel * QOLIBRI_MEAN

Linear

2752,048

1

2752,048

24,463

<,001

,433

Error(Wheel)

Linear

3599,943

32

112,498

Goals

Linear

31,579

1

31,579

1,247

,272

,038

Goals * Gender

Linear

6,148

1

6,148

,243

,626

,008

Goals * Time since injury

Linear

,021

1

,021

,001

,977

,000

Goals * Duration of treatment

Linear

45,918

1

45,918

1,813

,188

,054

Goals * QOLIBRI_MEAN

Linear

1,700

1

1,700

,067

,797

,002

Error(Goals)

Linear

810,333

32

25,323

Note. df=degrees of freedom; F=F ratio ;p=level of statistical significance.

A statistically significant effect of treatment can be seen in the assessments of life areas on the Wheel of life instrument. It is also evident that the effect of treatment is significantly correlated with the quality of life assessed with the QOLIBRI questionnaire. There is also a trend towards the importance of the duration of treatment on the improvement of life areas assessed with the Wheel of life instrument.

Table 2: Between-Subjects Effects

Type III Sum of Squares

df

Mean Square

F

p

η2

Intercept

4595,596

1

4595,596

36,198

<,001

,531

Gender

413,337

1

413,337

3,256

,081

,092

Time since injury

83,275

1

83,275

,656

,424

,020

Duration of treatment

425,062

1

425,062

3,348

,077

,095

QOLIBRI_MEAN

3301,878

1

3301,878

26,008

<,001

,448

Error

4062,575

32

126,955

Note. df=degrees of freedom; F=F ratio ; p=level of statistical significance.

In terms of gender and duration of the treatment, there is a trend towards effect on assessments of life areas on the instrument Wheel of life at both assessment times. Scores on the QOLIBRI instrument are significantly correlated with assessments at both assessment times.