RESULTS
The results of our research show a significant effect of treatment provided in Center Naprej on different life areas of the participants (Wheel of Life) (p < 0,01), which means that there were statistically significant differences in the results on the Wheel of life instrument between first and second assessment. Based on the results, we conclude that inclusion in long-term rehabilitation after an acquired brain injury has a positive effect on various areas of life. There is also an interaction between the duration of the treatment and the quality of life after the injury assessed with the QOLIBRI questionnaire, and also between the duration of the treatment and different areas of life assessed with the instrument Wheel of life (p < 0,01). There is also a trend towards significance of the effect of treatment with the duration of the treatment (p = 0,06, η2 = 0,11 – medium effect).
Table 1: Within-Subjects Contrasts
Wheel |
Goals |
Type III Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
p |
η2 |
|
Wheel |
Linear |
3070,488 |
1 |
3070,488 |
27,294 |
<,001 |
,460 |
|
Wheel * Gender |
Linear |
219,878 |
1 |
219,878 |
1,955 |
,172 |
,058 |
|
Wheel * Time since injury |
Linear |
89,708 |
1 |
89,708 |
,797 |
,379 |
,024 |
|
Wheel * Duration of treatment |
Linear |
431,980 |
1 |
431,980 |
3,840 |
,059 |
,107 |
|
Wheel * QOLIBRI_MEAN |
Linear |
2752,048 |
1 |
2752,048 |
24,463 |
<,001 |
,433 |
|
Error(Wheel) |
Linear |
3599,943 |
32 |
112,498 |
||||
Goals |
Linear |
31,579 |
1 |
31,579 |
1,247 |
,272 |
,038 |
|
Goals * Gender |
Linear |
6,148 |
1 |
6,148 |
,243 |
,626 |
,008 |
|
Goals * Time since injury |
Linear |
,021 |
1 |
,021 |
,001 |
,977 |
,000 |
|
Goals * Duration of treatment |
Linear |
45,918 |
1 |
45,918 |
1,813 |
,188 |
,054 |
|
Goals * QOLIBRI_MEAN |
Linear |
1,700 |
1 |
1,700 |
,067 |
,797 |
,002 |
|
Error(Goals) |
Linear |
810,333 |
32 |
25,323 |
Note. df=degrees of freedom; F=F ratio ;p=level of statistical significance.
A statistically significant effect of treatment can be seen in the assessments of life areas on the Wheel of life instrument. It is also evident that the effect of treatment is significantly correlated with the quality of life assessed with the QOLIBRI questionnaire. There is also a trend towards the importance of the duration of treatment on the improvement of life areas assessed with the Wheel of life instrument.
Table 2: Between-Subjects Effects
Type III Sum of Squares |
df |
Mean Square |
F |
p |
η2 |
|
Intercept |
4595,596 |
1 |
4595,596 |
36,198 |
<,001 |
,531 |
Gender |
413,337 |
1 |
413,337 |
3,256 |
,081 |
,092 |
Time since injury |
83,275 |
1 |
83,275 |
,656 |
,424 |
,020 |
Duration of treatment |
425,062 |
1 |
425,062 |
3,348 |
,077 |
,095 |
QOLIBRI_MEAN |
3301,878 |
1 |
3301,878 |
26,008 |
<,001 |
,448 |
Error |
4062,575 |
32 |
126,955 |
Note. df=degrees of freedom; F=F ratio ; p=level of statistical significance.
In terms of gender and duration of the treatment, there is a trend towards effect on assessments of life areas on the instrument Wheel of life at both assessment times. Scores on the QOLIBRI instrument are significantly correlated with assessments at both assessment times.